Year Began: 2005
Since 2005, PNAMP has supported monitoring practitioners, researchers, and other stakeholders to communicate and learn from each other regarding implementing restoration and effectiveness monitoring. Over time a forum for regional intensively monitored watersheds (IMWs) was generated and coordinated by PNAMP staff. The IMW Forum met regularly at workshops and teleconferences and developed reports.
PNAMP has now switched back to supporting the more general and more inclusive Action Effectiveness Monitoring project. In the Spring of 2026, PNAMP is hosting a symposium and panel at the Western Division American Fisheries Society (AFS) Conference in Portland, Oregon on Effectiveness Monitoring.
For more information about PNAMP’s Action Effectiveness Monitoring project or to get involved, email Madeleine Kopf-Patterson (MKopfPatterson@psmfc.org).
What's an IMW?
An intensively monitored watershed (IMW) is an experiment in one or more catchments with a well-developed, long-term monitoring program to determine watershed-scale fish and habitat responses to restoration actions (e.g., Zimmerman et al. 2012).
The loss of Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. and Steelhead O. mykiss is a significant ecological, economic, and societal issue facing the Pacific Northwest region of North America. Multiple factors including habitat loss, hatchery supplementation, hydropower, and overfishing have been identified as contributing to the decline or extirpation of these fish. The listing of many salmon and Steelhead populations under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) has resulted in approximately two decades of focused restoration efforts at the cost of several billion dollars (Bernhardt et al. 2005).

Restoration efforts are guided by the premise that increases in spawning and rearing habitat will improve juvenile life stage survival, ultimately increasing adult fish returns. However, linking habitat restoration to increased adult recruitment at the population level has been difficult (Roni et al. 2008). Further, effectiveness monitoring, the ability to monitor and detect a response from a restoration action, is not always funded or not funded at appropriate temporal and spatial scales to allow measurement of response. Therefore, monitoring and restoration practitioners often rely on incomplete or anecdotal evidence to infer responses in habitat and fish populations. Additional challenges to identifying successful population level responses (i.e., positive response to restoration) include experimental design, implementation, and analysis and monitoring issues (Roni et al. 2008; Bennett et al. 2016). In response to these challenges, IMWs have been implemented in many regions of the Pacific Northwest as long-term case studies to monitor, track, and report on the trajectory of habitat actions and fish population responses.
Individual IMWs

To support regional dialogue about IMWs, PNAMP has compiled short info sheets developed by IMW practitioners. Each info sheet provides an overview and elements such as experimental design, monitoring approach, restoration approach, restoration accomplishments, habitat responses, fish population responses, and future direction.
Join the Mailing List
To get emails about upcoming PNAMP IMW Forum meetings and activities, email Madeleine Kopf-Patterson (MKopfPatterson@psmfc.org) to join our mailing list.
Upcoming Events
Past Events
- Nov 16, Nov 30, & Dec 7, 2021: PNAMP IMW Management Applications Synthesis Workshops
- November 1-2, 2018: PNAMP Intensively Monitored Watersheds Workshop
- November 1-2, 2016: PNAMP Intensively Monitored Watersheds Workshop
- March 20-21, 2013: PNAMP Intensively Monitored Watersheds Workshop
- July 23-24, 2008: PNAMP Intensively Monitored Watersheds Workshop